top of page
Search

Understanding Boundary Surveying, Establishing the Legal Boundary with Evidence and Measured Facts

  • Writer: Stephen Hawes MFPWS MCIOB MCIArb AssocRICS MAPM MCABE C. Build E
    Stephen Hawes MFPWS MCIOB MCIArb AssocRICS MAPM MCABE C. Build E
  • Jan 17
  • 3 min read

Boundary surveying is a specialist area of professional practice for identifying, analysing and recording the legal position of a properties boundary lines, it sits at the intersection of land law, historical conveyancing and physical construction, and it is frequently required where uncertainty, proposed development pressure or neighbour disputes may arise.


In England and Wales, most registered land is held under the general boundaries rule, thus meaning that Land Registry title plans show boundary positions only in a general sense rather than fixing the precise legal line on the ground and in reality, this often leads to misunderstanding where fences, walls or buildings do not align neatly with title plans, and where historic features have moved, been replaced or removed over time.


A boundary surveyor’s role is to bring together all available evidence, including title deeds, Land Registry plans, historic conveyances, aerial photography, physical site features and measured survey data, to form a reasoned professional opinion as to where the legal boundary is likely to lie, this should always be based on well-established legal principles rather than assumption or convenience.


Existing physical features such as fences, walls, hedges and paving edges are often mistaken for a legal boundary position, however, these elements may have been installed/positioned for practical reasons, may also postdate the original conveyance document, or may have shifted over time, thus a boundary survey undertaken by an experienced boundary surveyor therefore requires careful scrutiny of whether such features were intended to mark ownership or merely to provide enclosure.


Measured site surveys form an important part of a surveyor’s boundary investigation, allowing distances, offsets and relationships between buildings and features so to be accurately recorded, this is particularly important where alleged encroachments are small in scale but significant in legal or financial terms, such as projecting walls, foundations, eaves or any substructures.


In many cases boundary disputes commonly arise during proposed or completed new development, where new foundations, extensions or walls are proposed close to a shared boundary with an adjoining neighbour, or where an adjoining owner alleges encroachment, loss of land or interference with their property/land, thus early involvement of an experienced boundary surveyor can often make clear and shed slight on the position and prevent escalation into protracted dispute.


A boundary surveyor may be instructed to prepare a boundary report, which sets out the documentary evidence, site observations, measurements and professional reasoning in a clear and structured format, such reports are frequently used in negotiations between neighbours, by solicitors, or as expert evidence in court or tribunal proceedings.


It is important to distinguish boundary surveying from disputes under the Party Wall etc. Act 1996, although the two often overlap in practice, boundary surveying addresses establishing (and evidencing) the correct position of the legal boundary and the extent of each owner’s legal title, whereas the Party Wall etc. Act 1996 process regulates/determines disputes in relation to certain types of construction work under its jurisdiction, appointed surveyors under ‘the act’ have no statutory jurisdiction to determine boundary/title disputes, thus misunderstanding this distinction can lead to inappropriate or unnecessary notices and/or an incorrect legal strategy.


Where matters can proceed to litigation, boundary surveyors acting as expert witnesses must comply with the relevant procedural rules and protocols, ensuring their independence and impartiality, transparency of their reasoning and proper consideration of reasonable alternative interpretations of the evidence from different perspectives, as courts will place weight on experts who demonstrate a clear structured methodology grounded in both law and in measured, well considered fact.


Thus, boundary surveying is about reducing uncertainty, providing clear reasoning, and supporting proportionate and pragmatic resolution, whether through early advice, formal reporting or expert determination, so a careful and methodical approach can save time, cost and neighbour conflict in an area of property law where precision and evidence matter and hold great weight.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page